Hamilton v. Miller
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Sumner District Court. Replevin. The facts are stated in the opinion. Judgment for plaintiff, Miller, at the November term, 1887. The defendant Hamilton and two others bring the case to this court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action of replevin, brought in the district court of Sumner county by George M. Miller, as cashier of the First National Bank of Wellington, against L. W. Hamilton, C. C. Hamilton, John H. Hamilton, and -Horsley, to recover certain neat cattle, .of the alleged value, in the aggregate, of f9,450. The plaintiff claimed a. special ownership therein, with the right to the immediate possession thereof, under a certain chattel mortgage executed by L. W. Hamilton, as the owner of the cattle, to Miller, as cashier, etc. The case was…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Harmon v. Electric Theatre Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Ragland v. Watkins National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- Rudisell v. JenningsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906