Rudisell v. Jennings
Indiana Court of Appeals
Erom Brown Circuit Court; W. J. Buckingham, Judge. Suit by Nathan M. Jennings against Bailey Rudisell and wife. Erom a decree for plaintiff, said Rudisell appeals.
1Opinion
On Petition for Rehearing.
Wiley, J.
2. Appellant has petitioned for a rehearing, and has assigned four reasons therefor, but they may all be grouped and considered under the single proposition which is urged by appellant, that the description of the property in the mortgage is too indefinite and uncertain, even as between the parties, to constitute a valid contract. The original opinion contains the following sentence: “The complaint specifically describes the property, and avers that it was the only property of its character owned by the mortgagors.” This expression is not wholly correct, and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tolbert v. HortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Plano Manufacturing Co. v. GriffithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Clapp v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Kenyon v. TramelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Adamson v. HortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.