Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Hill v. Board of Supervisors

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1888PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Certiorari on the relation of Francis A. Hill, as supervisor of the town of ■Ontario, in the county of Wayne, to review the proceedings of the board of ■supervisors of the county of Wayne in equalizing the assessments made by "-the assessors of the several towns.

1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.

The charge made by the relator is that the defendant adopted •an erroneous method in making the equalization, and that the result was prejudicial to his town. The statute imposing this duty on the board of supervisors of each county provides the manner of its performance to attain the object to be accomplished. They are required to examine the assessment rolls of the several towns in the county, for the purpose of ascertaining whether the valuations in one town bear a just relation to the valuations in •all other towns in the county. They may increase or diminish the aggregate valuations of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. The People Ex Rel. the Mayor v. . NicholsNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. People Ex Rel. Sims v. Board of Fire CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. The People v. . StilwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  4. People Ex Rel. Peck v. Commissioners of the Department of Fire & BuildingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  5. People Ex Rel. Wright v. . ChapinNew York Court of Appeals · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mussen v. Ausable Granite WorksNew York Supreme Court · 1892
  2. People Ex Rel. Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co. v. SeamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. People v. CoughtryNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Moroney v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1910
  5. Taylor v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API