Moroney v. State
New York Court of Claims
Claim against the State by a tenant of 'property appropriated for the Barge canal.
1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.
The claimant’s remedy in this claim is against the fund representing the property appropriated and not against the State.
He claims to have been a tenant of the property at the time of the appropriation, having produced in court a written lease, dated March 31, 1906, for five years, expiring March 31, 1911, leaving an unexpired term of two years, nine months and twenty-six days. The lease was recorded April 30, 1909, after the appropriation of the property, June 5, 1908, and after its purchase by the then owner. The lease was made between Daniel E. Rairdon, owner, and Frank J. Lester and the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- The People Ex Rel. the Mayor v. . NicholsNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Forster v. . ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- In re WilliamNew York Supreme Court · 1839
- Waterloo Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. ShanahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- People Ex Rel. Platt v. . RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Long v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Horoch v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Ackerman v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1951
- Durant v. WhedonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Tierney v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976