Legal Opinion

Watton v. Cruce

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 27, 1914No. 3953PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Action by H. C. Watton against Lee Cruce and others. Judg? ment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C,

The writ of error in this case was sued out to review the judgment of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to the amended petition. The defendants in error were sued as partners on an account for labor performed and services rendered under an oral contract entered into with the Oklahoma-Jamestown Exposition Company. The amended petition alleged, in part, as follows:

“That heretofore, on or about the 8th day of January, 1907, the above-named defendants associated themselves together under the firm name and style of the ‘Oklahoma-Jamestown Exposition Company,’ and did…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Attorney General ex rel. Miner v. LormanMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Wells, Fargo & Co. v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.United States Circuit Court · 1884
  3. Higbee v. Aetna Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Carver Mercantile Co. v. HulmeMontana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Agua Fria Copper Co. v. Bashford-Burmister Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Winterfield v. Hardin County Rural Electric CooperativeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  2. New Britain Trust Co. v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Guthrie Cotton Oil Co. v. Farmers Custom GinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Brown v. CruceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Opinion No. 68-261 (1968) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API