In Re Clement
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
Jean-Marie Clement appeals the decision of the United States Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences sustaining the rejection of claims 1-18 and 49-52 in reissue application Serial No. 08/054,951 under 35 U.S.C. § 251 (1994). Because the board correctly applied the recapture rule to bar claims 49-52 and because claims 1-18 alone cannot support the reissue application, we affirm in part and vacate in part.
Background
This ease is about U.S. Patent No. 4,780,-179 (the ’179 patent) issued to Jean-Marie Clement. The 179 patent claims a method for treating waste paper that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bell Communications Research, Inc. v. Vitalink Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Seattle Box Company, Inc., D/B/A Seattle-Tacoma Box Company v. Industrial Crating & Packing, Inc., and James F. RennelsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Abtox, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Exitron Corporation, Adir Jacob, and Mdt CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- In Re Leslie N. Wilder, James C. Whitney and Gary G. Matison, and Lanier Business Products, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Ball Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- MBO Laboratories, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Central Admixture Pharmacy Services v. Advanced Cardiac SolutionsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. Aspex Eyewear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- North American Container, Inc. v. Plastipak Packaging, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Shockley v. Arcan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.