Legal Opinion

Frito-Lay v. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided May 13, 1997No. Civil Action 3:96 CV-592HPublished

1Opinion of the Court

HEYBURN, District Judge.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties in this case have filed cross-motions for judgment as a matter of law. The question which these motions pose is whether Defendant, the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, is required to disclose a charge file to Plaintiff, Frito-Lay, Inc., in which Plaintiff was the subject of a racial discrimination claim brought by one of Plaintiff’s employees. Plaintiff claims that Defendant is required to disclose the file under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552. Defendant argues that because the employee is no…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Harry L. Reynolds, Jr. v. International Amateur Athletic Federation, the Athletic CongressCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. Moore, Owen, Thomas & Company v. L. Coleman Coffey and Robert Bruce Coffey, and L. Coleman Coffey and Robert Bruce Coffey v. Thomas O. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Associated Dry Goods Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Whittington v. MilbyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API