Legal Opinion

Daley v. Torrey

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1924No. 5,577PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

This action was instituted to obtain the cancellation of record of an oil and gas lease and to recover the statutory penalty with costs and an attorney fee and actual damages alleged to have been suffered by the plaintiffs. (Daley v. Torrey, 69 Mont. 599, 223 Pac. 498.) After the decision upon the former appeal plaintiffs procured a writ of attachment to be issued and property belonging to the defendant Torrey to be seized. Thereafter Torrey transferred his interest in the attached property to the Montana National Bank of Havre, and the new owner appeared in the action and moved to discharge…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stadler v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Mid-Northern Oil Co. v. WalkerMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Bordeaux v. BordeauxMontana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. State ex rel. Anaconda Copper Mining Co. v. District Court of the Second Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Reagan v. BoydMontana Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Wilson's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State Ex Rel. Golden Valley County v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Abell v. BishopMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Franzke v. Fergus CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Beavers v. RankinMontana Supreme Court · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API