Legal Opinion
Ruffin v. Deperio
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided March 30, 2000No. 1:95-cv-01043PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
The parties have consented to have the undersigned conduct any and all further proceedings in this case, including the entry of final judgment, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (Item 16).
Presently before me is the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (Items 75-1 and 75-2), the defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment (Item 79-1), and plaintiffs motion to reinstate claims against the State of New York and the Department of Correctional Services nunc pro tunc (Item 92-1). For the following reasons, plaintiffs motions for summary judgment…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dallio v. HebertDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Stevens v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Rivera v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Davidson v. ScullyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- In re La Paloma Generating Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.