Legal Opinion
Milwaukee and Southeast Wisconsin District Council of Carpenters v. Rowley-Schlimgen, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 17, 1993No. 92-2566PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
Rowley-Schlimgen, Inc. (Rowley) and the Milwaukee and Southeast Wisconsin District Council of Carpenters (the Union) are parties to a collective bargaining agreement (CBA). The CBA specifies that Rowley may hire only subcontractors that are “signatory to an agreement with the Greater Wisconsin Carpenters Bargaining Unit,” § 14.01(a), and provides for binding arbitration of all disputes or complaints arising under it. Several such disputes arose after the Union learned that Rowley had engaged carpet installers that were not signatory to a collective bargaining agreement.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Woelke & Romero Framing, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Building & Construction Trades Council of the Metropolitan District v. Associated Builders & Contractors of Massachusetts/Rhode Island, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- A. L. Adams Construction Co. v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. SummersTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Lineback v. Irving Ready-Mix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- United Rentals Highway Technologies, Inc. v. Indiana Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- National Labor Relations Board v. Irving Ready-Mix Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2011
- Spectacor Management Group v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.