Legal Opinion

Block v. Admr., Unemployment Comp. Act

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 15, 1950No. File 18716PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtComley, J.

The existence of a partnership relation is an ultimate conclusion to be drawn by the trier from all the subordh nate facts. Hotchkiss v. DeVita, 103 Conn. 436, 448.

It cannot be said that any one fact is determinative of the relationship, the essential question being whether, upon all the facts, “such a relation exists between them [the partners] that each is as to all the others, in respect to some business, both principal and agent.” Morgan v. Farrel, 58 Conn. 413, 422; Samstag & Hilder Bros. v. Ottenheimer, 90 Conn. 475, 478.

Where the parties are closely related, as in this case, “acts and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morgan v. FarrelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  2. Jenkins v. ReichertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  3. Hotchkiss v. DevitaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  4. Samstag Hilder Brothers v. OttenheimerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  5. Landow Co., Inc. v. MaisanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Paollela v. PaollelaConnecticut Superior Court · 1991
  2. Buonome v. Boni, No. Cv90307300 (Nov. 5, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API