Legal Opinion

United States v. Steven Hart

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 10, 2005No. 03-3731PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYE, Circuit Judge.

Steven Hart contends the district court 2 should have compelled the government to move for a reduction in Hart’s sentence pursuant to United States Sentencing Guideline (U.S.S.G.) § 5K1.1. We disagree and affirm.

I

This income tax evasion case is before us for a second time. We discussed the underlying facts at length in our first opinion, see United States v. Hart, 324 F.3d 575, 576-78 (8th Cir.2003), and will not repeat them here. The issue in this appeal concerns the events that occurred after we reversed Hart’s original sentence of twenty-one months and remanded for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Cory Baker Kamerud, United States of America v. Brett Christian KamerudCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. Bruce BarresseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Steven HartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Bridget Sue McClureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. David H. ArchuletaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Patrick Allen Vasquez, Also Known as Benji Vasquez, United States of America v. Dani Yaacoub MasseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Shaun Joseph RuffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. LeachCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Terrance OsborneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API