United States v. David H. Archuleta
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HANSEN, Circuit Judge.
David H. Archuleta appeals the sentence imposed by the district court 1 following Archuleta’s guilty plea to one count of mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (2000), and argues that the enhancements to his sentence imposed under the United States Sentencing Guidelines (Guidelines) violated his Sixth Amendment rights. We affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
Archuleta was a long-time employee of the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR), where he was the Purchasing Manager of Special Equipment. He and co-defendant Raymond Kyral devised a scheme to defraud UPRR by causing UPRR to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- United States v. John Kevin TalleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Derrick CrumeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. James BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Askia WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- United States v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.