Sexton v. Oak Ridge Treatment Center Acquisition Corp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Harsha, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} Oak Ridge Treatment Center Acquisition Corporation (“Oak Ridge”) appeals from a municipal court judgment awarding payment to Anita Sexton for “paid time off’ (“PTO”) that she had accrued but had not used when Oak Ridge terminated her employment. Oak Ridge asserts that the trial court erred as a matter of law in failing to enforce a provision of the Oak Ridge Employee Handbook stating that employees who resign or are terminated are not entitled to payment for their accrued but unused PTO. In determining that Sexton was entitled to payment, the trial court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- Collins v. RizkanaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Finsterwald-Maiden v. AAA South Central OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Sowards v. Norbar, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Adams v. Harding Machine Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fisher v. PayFlex Systems USANebraska Supreme Court · 2013
- Jones v. Conneaut City Health DepartmentOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Richardson v. MYCAPOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Shah v. Fortive CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024