Langlois v. State

Petitioner, David Langlois, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition under Criminal Procedure Rule Number One, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix in which he sought to set aside judgments and sentences, after “guilty” pleas, in five robbery cases.

The petitioner asserts several different grounds for relief. They have all been examined and appear to be without merit, and are conclusively refuted by the files *285and records, except Ms claim that he was “not represented by counsel at sentencing.” The record is silent as to whether his court appointed counsel was present at the time his sentences…