Legal Opinion

Grandin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 16, 1982No. Nos. 81-868, 81-1012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

By these consolidated appeals, we have for review an order revoking probation and a series of prison sentences imposed thereafter. For the reasons which follow, we reverse and remand for a new probation hearing.

It is undisputed on this record that the defendant Grandin was unrepresented by counsel at his probation revocation hearing and his sentencing hearing after unsuccessfully attempting to secure private counsel. It is also undisputed that the trial court did not advise the defendant of his right to appointed counsel in these proceedings and made no inquiry concerning his financial…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  5. Evans v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sanderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Mullins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Register v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API