Legal Opinion
Sharitt v. American Airlines
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided February 24, 1998No. 90099PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANSEN, Judge.
¶ 1 Petitioner, Charles Sharitt (Claimant), seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Court order awarding him benefits against Respondent, American Airlines (Employer). Claimant asserts error of the court in calculating his benefits.
¶2 As his sole allegation of error, Claimant contends the Workers’ Compensation Court erred, as a matter of law, in calculating the number of weeks of compensation for which Employer was liable. The facts are not in controversy, nor are the court’s findings as to the rate of compensation or various percentages of disability attributed to his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Cox v. DawsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Garrison v. Bechtel Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Stoldt Builders, Inc. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Stice v. DouglasCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richardson v. Bartlett-Collins Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
- Walker v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa CountyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
- Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. HarperCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
- Price v. Air Tulsa, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000