Legal Opinion

State v. Egan

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1999No. 980219Published

1Opinion of the Court

591 N.W.2d 150 (1999)

1999 ND 59

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Benjamin J. EGAN, Defendant and Appellant

No. 980219.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

April 6, 1999.

Bruce A. Romanick, Assistant State's Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.

Chad R. McCabe, of Vinje Law Firm, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant.

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Benjamin J. Egan appealed from a conviction entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of driving under suspension. We hold the trial court erred in refusing to allow Egan to present evidence that he did not receive a notice of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. State v. CleppeWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Zamarripa v. First Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. MichlitschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API