Legal Opinion

Schnupp v. Blair Pharmacy, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided June 6, 2024No. 1:17-cv-02335Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND UNITED STATES ex rel. TIMOTHY SCHNUPP, Relator, v. Civil No. ELH-17-2335 BLAIR PHARMACY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In this qui tam action, Timothy Schnupp, the Relator, has sued his former employer, Blair Pharmacy, Inc. (“BPI,” “Blair Pharmacy,” or “Pharmacy”), and its director and principal, Matthew Blair (“Mr. Blair”) (collectively, “Blair”), pursuant to the False Claims Act (“FCA” or “Act”),

31 U.S.C. §§ 3728

et seq. See ECF 1 (“False Claims Act Complaint”). In May 2022, following a lengthy investigation, the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Philips v. Pitt County Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  4. Stan Laber v. Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  5. Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API