Ford Motor Cred. Co. v. Suburban Ford
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
McFarland, J.:
This complex action arises from the contractual relationships between an automobile dealership (Suburban Ford), its source of financing of inventory under a floor plan agreement (Ford Motor Credit Company), and its supplier of automobiles and parts (Ford Motor Company). The individuals named as parties to the action (Ben W. Young, Margaret C. Young, Don W. Hansard and Linda M. Hansard) are: (1) sued herein as guarantors of the contracts on behalf of Suburban Ford; and (2) seeking damages for themselves for claimed injury to Suburban Ford…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bill G. Isler v. Texas Oil & Gas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
3Cited by36 opinions
- Snyder v. LovercheckWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Burcham v. Unison Bancorp, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Grynberg v. Questar Pipeline Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
- Ritchie Enterprises v. Honeywell Bull, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Hulse v. First American Title Co. of Crook CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.