Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Cred. Co. v. Suburban Ford

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 10, 1985No. 56,472PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.:

This complex action arises from the contractual relationships between an automobile dealership (Suburban Ford), its source of financing of inventory under a floor plan agreement (Ford Motor Credit Company), and its supplier of automobiles and parts (Ford Motor Company). The individuals named as parties to the action (Ben W. Young, Margaret C. Young, Don W. Hansard and Linda M. Hansard) are: (1) sued herein as guarantors of the contracts on behalf of Suburban Ford; and (2) seeking damages for themselves for claimed injury to Suburban Ford…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bill G. Isler v. Texas Oil & Gas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Snyder v. LovercheckWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Burcham v. Unison Bancorp, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. Grynberg v. Questar Pipeline Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Ritchie Enterprises v. Honeywell Bull, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
  5. Hulse v. First American Title Co. of Crook CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 2001

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API