Legal Opinion

Abramson v. Patts

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided September 15, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to vacate writ of seizure.

1Opinion of the CourtFinelite, J.

An order to show canse was. heretofore granted by one of the justices of this court, returnable this day, why an order should not he granted herein setting aside the writ of seizure made herein on August 27, 1910, and why an order should not be made directing the plaintiff, his attorney, the sheriff of the county of New York, or his deputy, to relinquish possession of the goods and chattels named in said writ, and why such goods and chattels should not he delivered over into the custody of the defendants, and why the defendants should not have such other and further relief in the premises as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. William Wharton, Jr., & Co. v. WinchNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Earle v. Gorham Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Halstead v. SwartzNew York Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carter v. PhillipsNew York Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Young v. Corbitt Motor Truck Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API