Legal Opinion · Dissent

Young v. Corbitt Motor Truck Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 29, 1929No. 12568Published

1DissentJustice Cothran

(dissenting) : I dissent from the conclusions announced in the opinion of Mr. Acting Associate Justice Ramage for the reasons which follow:

In the “Statement,” a part of the Transcript of Record, this appears: “The purpose of the action was to obtain judgment for the sum of $3,000.00, as damages for the alleged wrongful conversion of a certain Corbitt Motor Truck.”

This statement is sustained by the allegations of the complaint to 'the effect: “That the above-named defendant possessed itself of the following personal property belonging to and owned by the plaintiff (describing the truck), of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Harmon v. Dothan Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  2. City of Greencastle v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HanahanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  4. Powell v. GagnonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. Robert R. Sizer & Co. v. DopsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API