Young v. Corbitt Motor Truck Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentJustice Cothran
(dissenting) : I dissent from the conclusions announced in the opinion of Mr. Acting Associate Justice Ramage for the reasons which follow:
In the “Statement,” a part of the Transcript of Record, this appears: “The purpose of the action was to obtain judgment for the sum of $3,000.00, as damages for the alleged wrongful conversion of a certain Corbitt Motor Truck.”
This statement is sustained by the allegations of the complaint to 'the effect: “That the above-named defendant possessed itself of the following personal property belonging to and owned by the plaintiff (describing the truck), of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Harmon v. Dothan Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- City of Greencastle v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HanahanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
- Powell v. GagnonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Robert R. Sizer & Co. v. DopsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.