Jackson v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Judge.
A Fulton County jury found Samuel Jackson guilty of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. On appeal, Jackson challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. He also contends that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of two similar transactions. As the evidence was sufficient and the trial court did not err in admitting the similar transaction evidence, we affirm.
1. In reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we construe the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, and the defendant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence. We neither…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Hagood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Quezada v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Lawrence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Harvey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001