Quezada v. State

Blackburn, Judge.

Luis Serrano Quezada appeals his conviction of trafficking in methamphetamine contending that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of a similar transaction and that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm Quezada’s conviction.

1. Quezada contends that the trial court erred in admitting evi dence of a similar transaction because there was insufficient evidence to establish that he committed the similar transaction and that there was insufficient similarity between the previous act and the present crime charged.

“It…