Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Sherman S. Barge

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 20, 1985No. Supreme Court Disciplinary 369PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent in this disciplinary proceeding was found by the Special Master to have violated Standards 4, 44, 61, 63, and 65 of Rule 4-102 of the Rules and Regulations of the State Bar of Georgia. Violation of any of these standards may be punished by disbarment.

Barge represented Ms. Susie Brown (now Spence) in an action on a personal injury claim against a defendant insured by Southeastern Fidelity Insurance Company. The fee arrangement between Barge and Ms. Spence was that he would receive one-third of any sum collected. Although a suit was filed, the matter was settled and in December 1978…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. In Matter of ChanceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  3. In re BurgerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  4. In re DennisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  5. In re MykelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Matter of Robert A. MeierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Sweeney v. Athens Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  3. In re BargeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  4. Sweeney v. Athens Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API