Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 27, 1904PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Bexar. Tried below before Hon. S. J. Brooks.

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff, Stewart, alleged that while crossing Walnut Street in the city of. San Antonio, at or near where it crosses Cherry Alley, defendant’s servants engaged' in operating its cars negligently backed or kicked a car or cars down over said crossing, causing him to be thereby struck and injured. That the ordinance of the city required that a bell should be rung on all locomotives and kept ringing as it approached the crossing; that the night was dark and defendant failed to provide lights on the cars or to sound the bell or blow the whistle or to give any kind of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. G., C. & Santa Fe R'y Co. v. EvansichTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. RowlandTexas Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. v. McFerrinTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Agnew v. Coleman County Electric CooperativeTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Owl Taxi Service v. SaludisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Southern Iron & MacHine Co. v. PortugalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Coleman County Electric Co-op. Inc. v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API