Legal Opinion

Vause & Striegel, Inc. v. McKibbin

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1942No. 26446. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

This appeal presents for decision the validity of rule No. 20 promulgated by the Department of Finance, pursuant to section 12 of the Retailers’ Occupation Tax act. So far as relevant to this inquiry, rule No. 20 provides: “Regardless of how the retailer may set up his selling price, he is required to pay a tax measured by his gross receipts. For example, where a merchant follows the practice of selling an article for $1.00 and adds 3 cents thereto to reimburse himself for the three per cent tax which he will be required to pay, his gross receipts from such sale are $1.03, and he will be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Winter v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Bartholow v. DaviesIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  3. People Ex Rel. Barrett v. Oregon State Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Gee Coal Co. v. Department of FinanceIllinois Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of LogstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Kean v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2009
  3. People v. NunnIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Harrison Sheet Steel Co. v. LyonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  5. State Tax Commission v. Quebedeaux ChevroletArizona Supreme Court · 1951

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API