Legal Opinion
Cervelli v. Thompson / Center Arms
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 25, 2002No. 2:99-cv-01409PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SARGUS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of Defendant Thompson / Center Arms for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 44) and on the motion of Defendant Buffalo Bullet Co., Inc. for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 53). For the reasons that follow, Defendant Thompson / Center’s motion is granted in part and denied in part, and Defendant Buffalo Bullet’s motion is granted.
I
Plaintiff brings this action seeking recovery for injury sustained to his right eye in connection with his use of a .50 caliber Hawken muzzleloader rifle, manufactured by Defendant Thompson / Center…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- James Bultema v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Mohney v. USA Hockey, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Lykins v. Fun Spot TrampolinesOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Wells v. Komatsu America International Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Bultema v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.