Legal Opinion

Blumer v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Family Services

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 8, 2000No. 99-1053PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoggensack, J.

¶ 1. Irene Blumer appeals from a decision of the Department of Health and Family Services (DHFS) to deny her Medical Assistance (MA) benefits. Irene claims the hearing examiner erred in applying the "income-first" rule instead of the "resource-first" rule when determining whether to increase the community spouse resource allowance. The hearing examiner's decision was based on a provision found in the Wisconsin Statutes but not contained in federal law. Because we conclude that Wisconsin's income-first rule impermissibly conflicts with federal law, we reverse.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2. The facts of this…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schweiker v. Gray PanthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. UFE Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  3. 57 soc.sec.rep.ser. 220, Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 46,329 Robert Chambers v. Ohio Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Truttschel v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  5. Golf v. New York State Department of Social ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Department of Health & Family Services v. BlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Milwaukee Transport Services, Inc. v. Department of Workforce DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  3. Milwaukee Transport Services, Inc. v. Department of Workforce DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  4. Wisconsin Department of Health & Family Services v. BlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API