Ferrante v. Swedish American Lines
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
The District Judge found that the negligence of a stevedore in using a faulty method in discharging a ship’s cargo did not make the ship unseaworthy or negligent and this appeal and cross-appeal followed.1
The issues presented are whether the District Court used proper legal standards in arriving at its findings that the ship was neither negligent nor unsea-worthy. The libellants contend that the-District Court’s fact-findings were “clearly erroneous” because they were the end result of the failure to apply proper legal standards.
Since the District Court’s Findings of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Waldron v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Grigsby v. Coastal Marine Service of Texas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Stephen Edynak v. Atlantic Shipping Inc. Cie. Chambon MacLovia S. A. v. Allied Chemical Company, Atlantic Shipping, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Robert Spann v. J. LauritzenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Louis Antoine v. Lake Charles Stevedores, Inc., Lykes Brothers Steamship Company, Inc. And the Travelers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.