Warnick v. Warnick
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BURKE, Justice.
[¶ 1] Wilbur K. Warnick, Dee J. Warnick and Warnick Ranches (collectively, Warnick Ranches) appeal the district court’s determination of the amount owed to a withdrawing partner. Warnick Ranches claims the district court should have considered evidence of costs of a hypothetical asset sale to reduce the buyout price. We affirm.
ISSUE
[¶ 2] Warnick Ranches states its issue on appeal as:
Did the District Court abuse its discretion in excluding evidence offered by [Warnick Ranches] regarding the costs of liquidating partnership assets in determining the buyout price of a dissociated…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rodriguez v. CaseyWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- BP America Production Co. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Hansen v. 75 Ranch Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
- Anastos v. SableMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- In Re Donald Taffi Madelaine Taffi, Debtors. Donald Taffi Madelaine Taffi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rappaport v. GelfandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Kafka v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF FISHMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Kafka v. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife & ParksMontana Supreme Court · 2008