Legal Opinion

Warnick v. Warnick

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 2006No. 04-244PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Justice.

[¶ 1] Wilbur K. Warnick, Dee J. Warnick and Warnick Ranches (collectively, Warnick Ranches) appeal the district court’s determination of the amount owed to a withdrawing partner. Warnick Ranches claims the district court should have considered evidence of costs of a hypothetical asset sale to reduce the buyout price. We affirm.

ISSUE

[¶ 2] Warnick Ranches states its issue on appeal as:

Did the District Court abuse its discretion in excluding evidence offered by [Warnick Ranches] regarding the costs of liquidating partnership assets in determining the buyout price of a dissociated…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. CaseyWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. BP America Production Co. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Hansen v. 75 Ranch Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Anastos v. SableMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  5. In Re Donald Taffi Madelaine Taffi, Debtors. Donald Taffi Madelaine Taffi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rappaport v. GelfandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Kafka v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF FISHMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Kafka v. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife & ParksMontana Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API