Wentland v. Clark & Henery Construction Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an action to quiet title from a street assessment with t a cross-complaint by defendant for moneys claimed to be due under the assessment.
There were three cases set down in the trial court at the same time for trial—the present case, No. 1846, and the case of Lillie v. Clark & Henery Construction Co., post, p. 815, [173 Pac. 483]. In the third case Ann M. Phillips is plaintiff and is here on appeal in No. 1846. The trial court directed “that the evidence introduced, so far as the same is applicable, shall be considered as directed to the case to which the testimony may be pertinent as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ryan v. AltschulCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Fairchild v. WallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Perine v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Lillie v. Clark Henery Constr. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
3Cited by4 opinions
- Blake v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Southwest Paving Co. v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Lillie v. Clark Henery Constr. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
- Lillie v. Clark & Henery Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918