Legal Opinion

People v. King

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 25, 2000No. 1-99-1877PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cohen

Defendant Marcus King appeals the circuit court’s denial of his petition for relief pursuant to the Post-Conviction Hearing Act (725 ILCS 5/122 — 1 (West 1998)). After conducting an evidentiary hearing, the trial court determined that defendant’s trial counsel had not rendered ineffective assistance in violation of defendant’s constitutional rights. Because we cannot conceive of any sound trial strategy that would justify counsel’s failure to call an available alibi witness who would have bolstered an otherwise uncorroborated defense, we reverse and remand this case for a new trial.

I.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. FloresIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. People v. PalmerIllinois Supreme Court · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. People v. WilbornAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  2. People v. BryantAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. People v. GordonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. People v. ArroyoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API