Legal Opinion · Dissent

Remmel Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1967No. Appeal, 170Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones:

With the views expressed in and the result reached by the majority opinion, I must respectfully disagree. The basis of my disagreement is that the majority opinion completely ignores the clear language of the taxing statute.

On June 15, 1961, the legislature enacted a new “Inheritance and Estate Tax Act”1 which, inter alia, *336exempted from inheritance taxation transfers of property passing from a decedent to or for the use of charities and charitable organizations.2

This appeal presents a narrow question; what is the proper method to calculate the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. New York Trust Co. v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Tack's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Frick's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Swatara Township v. Automatic Bowling Centre, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Tracy EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API