Legal Opinion

Swatara Township v. Automatic Bowling Centre, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 9, 1965No. Appeals, Nos. 37 and 38PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts,

Appellee, Swatara Township, instituted suit against appellants, Automatic Bowling Centre, Inc. and Red Crown Bowling Center, Inc.,1 both owners and operators of bowling establishments within the township, to *484recover sums allegedly due under tbe township’s amusement tax ordinances for the period 1960-1963.2 Appellants denied liability, attacked the validity of the ordinances, and filed counterclaims for payments previously made. Judgment for the township and against appellants was entered in both cases and this appeal followed.

The ordinances under which the taxes…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Turco Paint & Varnish Co. v. KalodnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Murray v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Blauner's, Inc. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Pierce Oil Corp. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Commonwealth v. Willson Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Fedor v. Borough of DormontSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Clearview Bowling Center, Inc. v. Hanover BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Tredyffrin-Easttown School District v. Valley Forge Music Fair, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Lakelands Racing Ass'n v. Fairview TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API