Legal Opinion

Baynes v. McElrath

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 31, 1962No. 39775PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

The first special ground of the amended motion for a new trial assigns as error the following excerpt from the charge: “Now lady and gentlemen, there are different degrees of care required as to various parties in this case, and the court will attempt to give you in charge definitions of these degrees of care and to whom they apply as to the parties in this case. The plaintiff in this case, of course, was under a duty to exercise ordinary care for his own safety at the time, and if by the exercise of ordinary care he could have avoided the negligence of these defendants,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wade v. DrinkardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  2. Fountain v. TidwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  3. Nash v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wright v. DilbeckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Hanley v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Wright v. DilbeckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API