Legal Opinion

Shook v. Shook

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 12, 1901PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Davis District Court. — How. E. W. Eichelberger, Judge. Action for divorce. Decree for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

The parties married at leisure and repented in haste. The defendant was a widower of 56 years, when married in June 1898, and of avoirdupois 105 pounds; '-the plaintiff was 36 years his junior — 20 years old — at that time, and 50 pounds heavier. They had courted 4 years, but lived together as husband and wife less than 6 months. He;had 460 acres of'unincumbered land; she had youth, and, it is said, beauty as well. He was industrious, but unlearned; she could read and sing. Both were accomplished in this: they knew how to work. Though reared in town, she accommodated herself;to the new…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Massie v. MassieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  2. Bear v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Rasmussen v. RasmussenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  4. Dillavou v. DillavouSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  5. Hullinger v. HullingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API