Legal Opinion

Hullinger v. Hullinger

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 9, 1907PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Clinton District Court.— Hon. A. B. Barker, Judge. Suit for a divorce. Judgment for the plaintiff, from) which the defendant appeals.—

1Opinion of the Court

Sherwin, J.—

The parties to this action were married in 1892. They have two children; Cecil W., now about ten years old, and Lowell, who is about three and one-half years of age. The petition alleges cruel and inhuman treatment such as t.o endanger life; the specific charges being physical violence, abusive language, and excessive sexual demands. The decree gave the plaintiff a divorce and the custody of the children, reserving to the defendant the right to visit the latter at stated times, and to have them with him for a period not exceeding two weeks, twice each year, providing the children…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Berry v. BerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Shook v. ShookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Massie v. MassieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  2. Murray v. MurraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  3. Yoshida v. Security InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Beyerink v. BeyerinkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  5. Getchell v. Mercantile & Manufacturer's Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API