Legal Opinion

Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Ocan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 11, 1925No. 2372Published

1Opinion of the Court

HAUL,- 'C. J.

The appellee sued the appellant company to recover damages in. the sum of $8,000, as the result' of personal injuries sustained by him when he alleges he was struck by one of defendant’s freight trains at Canyon, Tex. The substance of his pleading is that appellant maintained and operated two railway tracks at its station in the town of Canyon, said tracks being within a few feet of each other, and that it had caused to be laid off .and marked out upon the space between said railway, tracks opposite the station what is commonly known as the safety zone; that said zone was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Trochta v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of TexasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  2. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. NeffTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Hines v. ArrantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. H. & T. C. R'y Co. v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. State Ex Rel. Vulgamott v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API