Legal Opinion
Gilliam v. Watanabe
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided September 1, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00201Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII WILLIAM H. GILLIAM, Civ. No. 20-00201 JMS-RT Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS, ECF NOS. 20 & 28, AND vs. DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND, ECF NO. 39 THE HONORABLE KATHLEEN N.A. WATANABE and DAVID LAM, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS, ECF NOS. 20 & 28, AND DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND, ECF NO. 39 I. INTRODUCTION The court considers two motions to dismiss pro se Plaintiff William H. Gilliam’s (“Plaintiff” or “Gilliam”) Complaint—the first motion is by Defendant David Lam (“Lam”), ECF No. 20, and the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.