Legal Opinion

Howk v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided April 1, 1998No. 09-96-106 CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHN HILL 1 Justice (Assigned).

Duane E. Howk appeals his conviction by a jury of the offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child. Following Howk’s plea of true to enhancement allegations, the jury assessed his punishment at life imprisonment in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. He contends in seven points that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction and that the trial court erred in overruling: (1) his timely objection and in admitting State’s exhibits one through five, as Tex.Code Cum Proc. Ann. art. 18.02(10) (Vernon 1977)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Sledge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Bishop v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Houston v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
  2. John Petronella v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API