Legal Opinion

Hoskins v. Stites

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 12, 1938No. 27941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This is an appeal from an order sustaining the demurrer to the petition of plaintiff and dismissing the cause in an action for the reformation of a deed and to quiet title.

Tire parties are in the' same relation here as in the trial court.

Plaintiff’s petition alleged mutual mistake and mistake of the scrivener in the preparation of a contract for a deed and the deed itself.

The contract and deed, as drawn, covered lots 5, 0, 7, and 8, in block 40, in the city of Kingfisher, Kingfisher county, Okla. The mistake alleged is that lots 7, 8, 9, and 10 were intended by all parties to be conveyed to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. . JuddNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Swatts v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Barrows v. AlfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Harris v. IveySupreme Court of Alabama · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Flowers v. StanleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. Maloy v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Nelson v. DaughertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Good v. CohlmiaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Mundy v. Dependent School Dist. No. 32Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API