Legal Opinion · Dissent

Huber v. COLORADO MINING ASS'N

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 31, 2011No. 10SC220Published

1DissentJustice Coats

Unlike the majority, I believe that in the absence of voter approval the Taxpayer Bill of Rights Amendment to the Colorado Constitution bars the continuous tax rate increases mandated by section 39-29-106 of the revised statutes, and I therefore respectfully dissent. Because I also believe the majority fundamentally misconstrues the problem posed by the continued enforcement of such a statute, I write separately to briefly outline my views.

There can really be no question that TABOR bars increases in tax rates without advance voter approval or that changing the rate at which extracted coal is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Oakland Paving Co. v. HiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Bickel v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. Bolt v. Arapahoe County School District No. SixSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. People v. BurkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API