Legal Opinion

State v. Pernell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1968No. 1353PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

This is an attempt by the state of Ohio by the mere filing of a notice of appeal to perfect an appeal as of right from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court for defendant entered pursuant to the sustaining of a demurrer to the indictment. Under the provisions of Section 6 of Article IV of the Constitution of Ohio, as it existed at the time this appeal was attempted to be perfected, and under the provisions of Section 4 of Article IV of the Constitution of Ohio, effective May 7, 1968 (Euclid v. Heaton, 15 Ohio St. 2d 65), Courts of Appeals have “such jurisdiction as may be provided…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Euclid v. HeatonOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. DodgeOhio Court of Appeals · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Village of Northwood v. VolschowOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. State v. BoyleOhio Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API