In re Schwartz
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Per curiam
This matter is before the Court on Respondent Jeffrey N. Schwartz’ Petition for Voluntary Discipline filed pursuant to the provisions of State Bar Rule 4-227 (b) (2) prior to the State Bar’s filing of a Formal Complaint. In his petition, Schwartz seeks the imposition of an 18-month suspension retroactive to May 9, 2003 for his admitted violations of Rule 8.4 (a) (4) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, see Bar Rule 4-102 (d). Although a violation of Rule 8.4 (a) (4) is punishable by disbarment, the State Bar recommended the acceptance of Schwartz’ voluntary petition and this Court…
2Cited by5 opinions
- In re AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. MarkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2008
- In re Stacey Adamski, Esq. (Office of Disciplinary Counsel)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- In re Stacey Adamski, Esq. (Office of Disciplinary Counsel)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. MarkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2008