Legal Opinion

Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Markins

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 2008No. 33256Published

1Opinion of the Court

663 S.E.2d 614 (2008)

LAWYER DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Petitioner

v.

Michael P. MARKINS, a Member of the West Virginia State Bar, Respondent.

No. 33256.

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.

Submitted April 1, 2008.

Decided May 23, 2008.

Concurring Opinion of Justice Starcher June 8, 2008.

Rachael L. Fletcher Cipoletti, Charles A. Jones, III, Office of Disciplinary Counsel, Charleston, WV, for the Petitioner.

Michael O. Callaghan, Neely & Callaghan, Charleston, WV, for the Respondent.

2Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, Respondent Michael P. Markins ("Respondent") objects to the sanctions recommended…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Committee on Legal Ethics of West Virginia State Bar v. BlairWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. McCorkleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. WalkerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Office of Lawyer Disciplinary Counsel v. JordanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. ScottWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API