Legal Opinion

Mahoney v. Ernst & Young LLP

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided March 21, 2006No. CIV.A. V-04-41PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

RAINEY, District Judge.

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Nancy K. Johnson’s Memorandum, Recommendation, and Order (“M & R”) entered February 2, 2006 (Dkt.# 94). Timely objections to the M & R were filed by the Plaintiff on February 16, 2006 (Dkt.# 95). After considering the M & R, the objections, the entire record, and the applicable law, the Court SUSTAINS Plaintiffs objection to the calculation of the FMLA period and Plaintiffs objection to the conclusion that Defendant established, as a matter of law, that Plaintiff failed to mitigate damages. Plaintiffs other objections are…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weidner v. Unity Health Plans Ins. Corp.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2009
  2. Baeza v. Verizon Wireless Texas, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2020
  3. In re M/V AET Excellence and M/V AET InnovatorDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2025
  4. Weeks Marine, Inc. v. Atlantic Sounding Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API