Legal Opinion

Universal Acupuncture Pain Services, P.C. v. Quadrino & Schwartz, P.C.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 2, 2004No. 02-9469Published

1Opinion of the Court

370 F.3d 259

UNIVERSAL ACUPUNCTURE PAIN SERVICES, P.C., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee,

Dipak Nandi, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

QUADRINO & SCHWARTZ, P.C., Appellant,

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Defendant-Counter-Claimant.

No. 02-9469.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued: December 2, 2003.

Decided: June 2, 2004.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Evan S. Schwartz, Quadrino & Schwartz, P.C. (Richard J. Quadrino, Jason A. Newfield, of counsel), Garden City, NY, for Appellant.

Anthony J. Mamo, Jr., Medina & Mamo, Sleepy Hollow, NY, for Appellees.

Before: VAN GRAAFEILAND,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Lai Ling Cheng v. Modansky Leasing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Diane Leibovitz v. New York City Transit Authority, Joseph Hoffman and Monroe EasterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  4. Matter of TillmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Cohen v. Grainger, Tesoriero & BellNew York Court of Appeals · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API