Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS GROKSTER, LTD.’S AND STREAMCAST NETWORKS, INC.’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITH RESPECT TO DEFENDANTS GROK-STER, LTD. AND STREAMCAST NETWORKS, INC.
WILSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs bring these actions for copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C. §§ 501, et seq. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Plaintiffs 1 and Defendants StreamCast Networks, Inc. and Grokster, Ltd. (“Defendants”) filed cross-motions for summary judgment with regard to contributory and vicarious infringement.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Keenan v. AllanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. v. FungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.District Court, C.D. California · 2007
- Arista Records, Inc. v. Flea World, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.