Legal Opinion

Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided April 25, 2003No. CV 01-08541 SVW PJWX, CV 01-09923 SVW PJWXPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS GROKSTER, LTD.’S AND STREAMCAST NETWORKS, INC.’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITH RESPECT TO DEFENDANTS GROK-STER, LTD. AND STREAMCAST NETWORKS, INC.

WILSON, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs bring these actions for copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C. §§ 501, et seq. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Plaintiffs 1 and Defendants StreamCast Networks, Inc. and Grokster, Ltd. (“Defendants”) filed cross-motions for summary judgment with regard to contributory and vicarious infringement.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Keenan v. AllanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. v. FungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.District Court, C.D. California · 2007
  4. Arista Records, Inc. v. Flea World, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
  5. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API