Fillmore City v. Reeve
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Justice:
Fillmore City brought this action to abate and enjoin an alleged nuisance created by the defendants in keeping pigs and cattle and horses on premises at the edge of and partly within its city limits where the zoning was only for residential use. Defendants denied the charge of nuisance and affirmatively alleged a right to keep livestock on the premises because of a prior established non-conforming use, which was expressly exempted by the zoning ordinance. 1
On November 11,1974, at a hearing on an order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not be issued, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cheney v. RuckerUtah Supreme Court · 1963
- Lamb v. BangartUtah Supreme Court · 1974
- Hooper v. General Motors Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
- Taylor v. E. M. Royle Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
- Hardy v. HendricksonUtah Supreme Court · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Little v. Utah State Division of Family ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Hal Taylor Associates v. Unionamerica, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Atkin, Wright & Miles, CharteredUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. RothlisbergerUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- FMA Financial Corp. v. Hansen Dairy, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.